Changes

'''Ludoh''' was a prominent historian and writer who lived in [[Tarnaria]] in the 1st century of the [[dantrian calendar|second revolution]]. While she left a significant literary legacy, especially the part that describes the lives of others, surprisingly little is known about her. She was born in [[Deeras]] and died in [[Asdoh]]. Virtually nothing is recorded about her life in between.

'''Ludoh''' /'luːdə/ was a prominent historian and writer who lived in [[Tarnaria]] in the 1st century of the [[dantrian calendar|second revolution]]. While she left a significant literary legacy, especially the part that describes the lives of others, surprisingly little is known about her. She was born in [[Deeras]] and died in [[Asdoh]]. Virtually nothing is recorded about her life in between.

Ludoh's work is one of the most important accounts of the history of early Tarnaria. Her main focus was the history of [[Toor]] and, specifically, the [[Dolysoh]] dynasty. Unlike the works of another prominent historian of the era, [[Porteek]], Ludoh's writing is less academic and less reliable, although independent evidence does suggest that the gist of her historical narrative is correct. However, she tends to be less compromising when it comes to ambiguous evidence, opting to pick a hypothesis and present it as fact. She also never cites her sources. Coupled with the fact that most of her works go into the most intricate detail of the inner workings of the ruling class, the reliability of her account is suspect, unless she herself had direct access to royalty.

Ludoh's work is one of the most important accounts of the history of early Tarnaria. Her main focus was the history of [[Toor]] and, specifically, the [[Dolysoh]] dynasty. Unlike the works of another prominent historian of the era, [[Porteek]], Ludoh's writing is less academic and less reliable, although independent evidence does suggest that the gist of her historical narrative is correct. However, she tends to be less compromising when it comes to ambiguous evidence, opting to pick a hypothesis and present it as fact. She also never cites her sources. Coupled with the fact that most of her works go into the most intricate detail of the inner workings of the ruling class, the reliability of her account is suspect, unless she herself had direct access to royalty.