2,510
edits
Changes
From The Continent Chronicles
Jump to navigationJump to searchno edit summary
Porteek's writing is noted for careful analysis and his focus on considering several explanations, listing his sources and providing reasoning around their reliability. In this he is usually contrasted with [[Ludoh]], who was a more prolific author of the era, but whose sources are rarely listed and who tends to state hypotheses as fact. None of Porteek's sources have survived, but the list of sources is at the very least helpful to realize the extent of early Tarnarian literature that was lost, most probably due to the spread of [[Mōroh]].
Porteek's writing is noted for careful analysis and his focus on considering several explanations, listing his sources and providing reasoning around their reliability. In this he is usually contrasted with [[Ludoh]], who was a more prolific author of the era, but whose sources are rarely listed and who tends to state hypotheses as fact. None of Porteek's sources have survived, but the list of sources is at the very least helpful to realize the extent of early Tarnarian literature that was lost, most probably due to the spread of [[Mōroh]].
He nonetheless held strong opinions about certain events and people. Specifically, even his dry description of the life of [[Sopoh Dolysoh]] betrays his disapproval of both Sopoh's massacre of [[Meledesians]] and [[Bonten|Bonten's]] betrayal of [[Doroh Hun]]. The latter is interesting, since the story is outlined in the third volume, with the first two volumes describing many betrayals which don't seem to worry Porteek. He is also quite dismayed by Gened, which to some suggests that Porteek had a different standard for the founders of states and enjoyed casting a critical eye on their achievements.
Porteek was the last historian of the second revolution to approach history more as an academic subject, as opposed to a political narrative. Mlan, one of the first analytical historians of the third revolution, held Porteek in high regard and named him as an inspiration.
Porteek was the last historian of the second revolution to approach history more as an academic subject, as opposed to a political narrative. Mlan, one of the first analytical historians of the third revolution, held Porteek in high regard and named him as an inspiration.
[[Category:Historian]]
[[Category:Historian]]
