Changes

From The Continent Chronicles
Jump to navigationJump to search
8 bytes added ,  00:34, 11 April 2021
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
'''Ludoh''' /'luːdə/ was a prominent historian and writer who lived in [[Tarnaria]] in the 1st century of the [[dantrian calendar|second revolution]]. While she left a significant literary legacy, especially the part that describes the lives of others, surprisingly little is known about her. She was born in [[Deeras]] and died in [[Asdoh]]. Virtually nothing is recorded about her life in between.
 
'''Ludoh''' /'luːdə/ was a prominent historian and writer who lived in [[Tarnaria]] in the 1st century of the [[dantrian calendar|second revolution]]. While she left a significant literary legacy, especially the part that describes the lives of others, surprisingly little is known about her. She was born in [[Deeras]] and died in [[Asdoh]]. Virtually nothing is recorded about her life in between.
   −
Ludoh's work is one of the most important accounts of the history of early Tarnaria. Her main focus was the history of [[Toor]] and, specifically, the [[Dolysoh]] dynasty. Unlike the works of another prominent historian of the era, [[Porteek]], Ludoh's writing is considered to be less reliable, although independent evidence does suggest that the gist of her historical narrative is correct. However, she tends to be more compromising when it comes to ambiguous evidence, opting to pick a hypothesis and present it as fact. She also never cites her sources. Coupled with the fact that most of her works go into the most intricate detail of the inner workings of the ruling class, the reliability of her account is suspect, unless she herself had direct access to royalty.
+
Ludoh's work is one of the most important accounts of the history of early Tarnaria. Her main focus was the history of [[Toor]] and, specifically, the [[Dolysoh dynasty]] dynasty. Unlike the works of another prominent historian of the era, [[Porteek]], Ludoh's writing is considered to be less reliable, although independent evidence does suggest that the gist of her historical narrative is correct. However, she tends to be more compromising when it comes to ambiguous evidence, opting to pick a hypothesis and present it as fact. She also never cites her sources. Coupled with the fact that most of her works go into the most intricate detail of the inner workings of the ruling class, the reliability of her account is suspect, unless she herself had direct access to royalty.
    
The latter is suggested by Porteek, who believes that Ludoh might have been as confident as she was in her conclusions, because she either participated in some of these events herself or, when dealing with the history of the dynasty, received accounts from the members of the family. However, in none of her writing does Ludoh ever state her role or even if Ludoh was her real name.
 
The latter is suggested by Porteek, who believes that Ludoh might have been as confident as she was in her conclusions, because she either participated in some of these events herself or, when dealing with the history of the dynasty, received accounts from the members of the family. However, in none of her writing does Ludoh ever state her role or even if Ludoh was her real name.

Navigation menu